SGMA Changes its name after 107 years to Sports and Fitness Industry Association (SFIA)
Posted: September 27, 2012 Filed under: Sporting Goods Manufacturing Association (SGMA) | Tags: Board of directors, Chairman, Marketing research, SFIA, SGMA, SIFA, Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association Leave a comment »
|
|||||||||||||||
Critical Dates Regarding the New Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act
Posted: October 16, 2008 Filed under: Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), Sporting Goods Manufacturing Association (SGMA) Leave a comment »
November 12th is the First in a Series of Critical Dates Regarding the New Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) SGMA Members are being alerted now to act with all due speed. Non-compliance with the Act may put your company at risk for monetary and possible criminal violations. SGMA and our Legal Task Force are in communication with the CPSC and attend all Commission meetings and hearings that pertain to issues affecting you. The following are some of the most pressing deadlines and issues that you need to be aware of and address immediately: • On November 12, 2008 all products subject to the CPSIA bans and standards as well as subject to any similar rule, ban, standard or regulation under any other Act enforced by the Commission, must be self-certified with a General Conformity Certification. • The General Conformity Certificate must be based on a “test of each product or upon a reasonable testing program.” • Certificates must accompany each product or shipment of products covered by the same certificate. And, a copy of the certificate must be furnished to each and every distributor and retailer of the product. • If a General Conformity Certificate does not accompany each imported product or product shipment then all of your products “shall be refused admission.”Products refused admission can be destroyed! • The Commission warned that each company needs to go through a detailed analysis of its products to determine whether your products are subject to the CPSIA’s new self-certification requirements. It is imperative for your company to do a thorough product analysis. Do not delay! Call SGMA or our Legal Task Force members for advice immediately. This ALERT is merely a tip of the iceberg with respect to what SGMA members must do to comply with the CPSIA and its rolling dates over the next 2-3 years. To keep you well-informed SGMA’s Legal Task Force will have another conference call on October 27, 2008 to update you on the most pressing deadlines and issues involving the CPSIA and the up-to-date thinking of the Commission. Details regarding the call will be emailed shortly. SGMA members can visit www.sgma.com for further CPSC details and to access a CPSC Improvement Act Recap PowerPoint Presentation that summarizes the issues that were discussed during the September 11th CPSC Conference Call that SGMA hosted. Members can also contact Chris Strong, SGMA’s Director of Business Development, at 202.349.9413 or cstrong@sgma.com.
SGMA’s Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act Conference Call
Posted: September 11, 2008 Filed under: Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), Sporting Goods Manufacturing Association (SGMA) Leave a comment »
SGMA’s Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act Conference Call September 11, 2008 AGENDA Black is the original Agenda from the SGMA Red is my notes from the conference call Blue are hyperlinks Introduction and Welcome Tom Cove, President and CEO of SGMA Mark Granger, Partner, Morrison Mahoney LLP Overview of CPSC Act Paul Rosenlund, Partner, Duane Morris LLP Compliance with and Implications of Phthalate and Lead Restrictions Gary Wolensky, Partner, Snell & Wilmer LLP Third Party Certification Mark Granger, Partner, Morrison Mahoney LLP Label Tracking and Certificates Bruce Cranner, Partner, Frilot LLC Inventory Issues Paul Rosenlund, Partner, Duane Morris LLP Question and Answer Session E-mail Mark Granger at MGranger@morrisonmahoney.com with any questions you would like to have discussed at this time. What about state rules and regulations that are more stringent than the Federal rules Gary Wolensky: state law will not be pre-empted by the federal act. State law will still apply, except for Phthalate. The act is it pre-emptive by CA Proposition 65 Any damage claims (plaintiff’s claims) is still based on state law Sporting good designed for educational use, is that a toy? Gary Wolensky: Get advice, go through the product and product line and figure out whether the article is sporting good or something else. Personal use, consumption use or enjoyment in or around personal residence, school recreation or otherwise What about certifications provided by foreign countries? Barring some sort of treaty or CPSC agreement those certifications will not work and must be certified under US rules Not just a function of what the product is made of Small parts Children’s products Everything will require 3rd party certification You will need to find lawyers skilled in this and independent labs skilled in this Paul Rosenlund: there will be a separate set of rules for foreign labs EU standard will not exempt you from the CPSC Is children’s footwear children’s toys? Arguably under the definition it is a consumer product and used to play. Can it end up in the kid’s mouth, then it might be a toy Inaccessible parts made of Phthalate or lead? Inaccessible part the issue is the part really inaccessible? You are comparing the percentage concentration to the totality to the product whether accessible or not. Probably specific regulations on accessible issues How do I tell if I am a child’s product toy or just a sporting good? Clearly sporting goods fall within the definition of child’s products The critical inquiry is “is your product a toy or sporting goods” Look at the intended use Look at the advertising and marketing Is it used in team sports or individual sports Is it cute, colorful etc is a toy Are your instructions, warnings, etc aimed at a child above age 12? Do the instructions say only for use by children over age 12? Certificates? A lot of information is not known yet on labels and certificates. Waiting on CPSC to provide more guidance. Everyone who manufactures a product must be on the certificate Where it came from, who manufactured it Tracking label must provide opportunity for the ultimate purchase to determine manufactures date time and location and batch run and time. Paul: another provision of the act CPSC now has authority without a complaint or investigation the right to ask any importer retailer or manufactures for all supply chain information including component suppliers. Gary W. as of this morning on the CPSC the PowerPoint’s are up from the presentations made by the CPSC last week. Ended at 12: 30 PM MST SGMA Conference Call Sponsored by: KEY CONTACT INFORMATION Bruce Cranner Mark Granger Tom Cove Frilot LLC Morrison Mahoney LLP SGMA 504.599.8151 617.439.7518 202.349.9422 Paul Rosenlund Gary Wolensky Bill Sells Duane Morris LLP Snell & Wilmer LLP SGMA 415.957.3178 714.427.7022 202.349.9417
BCranner@frilot.com
MGranger@morrisonmahoney.com
TCove@sgma.com
PSRosenlund@duanemorris.com
GWolensky@swlaw.com BSells@sgma.com



