Southeast Chapter of Travel and Tourism Research Association Annual Conference & Tourism Research Symposium

Call for Papers

Deadline: November 24, 2008

The SETTRA Conference is held in conjunction with Southeast Tourism Society Spring Meeting, to be held March 23 – March 25, 2009, in Montgomery, Alabama. The Research Symposium will be on Tuesday, March 24. Abstracts will be reviewed and presenters will be notified of their acceptance by January 16, 2009. Presentation abstracts and proposals by both academic researchers and practitioners are welcome in the following two categories:

1. Oral Research Paper Presentation 2. Illustrated Paper (poster) Presentation

I.Abstracts are requested for research paper presentations and for illustrated paper (poster)

presentations. Abstracts should focus on the following:

  • Applied Travel and Tourism
  • Case Studies
  • Management of Tourism
  • Tourism Marketing
  • Tourism Development
  • Tourism Planning
  • Sustainable Tourism
  • Tourism Research
  • Methodological Aspects of Tourism Research

Specific methods, results, and applications should be emphasized. The papers will be presented at the workshop and published in a proceeding. The authors and presenters of accepted papers and presentations are expected to register for the Research Symposium and/ or the Conference. Oral research and illustrated paper presentations: Abstracts should be submitted electronically, preferably in MS Word format using APA format and graphic quality requirements. Material submitted for review must consist of:

(1) Title Page: With the title of the paper and the author’s names, affiliations, complete addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses. Please also indicate on the title page one of the three choices below (a, b, or c) to indicate how the abstract should be reviewed:

a. Review only for an oral presentation.

b. Review first for an oral presentation and second for display as an illustrated paper presentation.

c. Review only for display as an illustrated paper presentation. Those researchers whose material lends itself to visual rather than verbal communication should submit poster presentations.

(2) Abstract: No more then a 2000 word abstract (not including figures, tables, and references) with the title of the paper/poster centered at the top. Abstracts should clearly state the purpose, results, conclusions, and applications of the research.

Submit Abstracts to: Erick T Byrd, PhD, Department of Recreation, Tourism, & Hospitality Management, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, PO Box 26170, Greensboro, NC 27402. Phone: (336) 334- 3041. Email: etbyrd@uncg.edu

Conference Registration: For information about the conference registration contact:

SETTRA/ Southeast Tourism Society

3400 Peachtree Rd., ND; Suite 725 Atlanta, GA 30326

Phone: (404) 364- 9847 Fax: (404) 262- 9518

http://www.settra.org / http://www.SoutheastTourism.org


Freak Accident is really a normal occurrence.

In what is being described as a “freak accident” a 14 year old died when he fell out of a tree at a summer camp in the Catskill’s. See Teen dies in summer camp accident. The youth was 30 feet up a pine tree when a branch broke and he fell to the ground.

The freak part must have been the branch breaking rather than a child falling out of a tree. If you mix trees and kids, kids are going to climb trees. And branches have been braking before kids started climbing trees.

Out condolences to the family.

For more information see: Boy, 14, dies after falling 30 feet from tree


Shallow Water Blackout Article

Parks and Rec Business Magazine has a very interesting article on shallow water blackout. The article was written by a professor who experienced it personally. See Shallow Water Blackout: Get the Facts to Prevent Drowning. The article is very interesting and does a great job of describing this easy way to die when you are snorkeling or trying to hold your breath underwater.

Shallow Water Blackout is difficult to recognize and yet can kill a swimmer from consciously attempting to hold their breath. This occurs, as the article describes when trying to increase a snorkeler’s time underwater.


Should the government keep us safe?


This is a very interesting article out of Canada about government intervention in our private activities. See If we only endanger ourselves, should government intervene?

The base of the article is the government should intervene to keep us from hurting third parties. But what right does the government have to protect us from ourselves?

The article is based proposed new rules for using ATV’s (All Terrain Vehicles). The proposed rules require the use of a helmet by ATV riders.

There are lots of arguments on both sides of this issue. Some of my favorite have to do with a little Darwinian clean up of the gene pool and the need for more organ donors.

But the real issue is freedom to experience our lives the way we want to live them.

The article also argues that the law is not going to make a difference. A law is not going to make someone do something they do not want to do. Proof of this argument is the current US prison system. If laws really did work, prisons would be empty or only holding first time offenders.

An even better argument is the following:

As troublesome as the notion is of a drunk, helmetless yahoo ripping around his acreage on an ATV, the notion of law enforcement entering that private property to write a ticket is far more disturbing.

The article correctly looks at the loss of the greater freedom. What is more important to protect the freedom to choose to not wear a helmet or the constitutionally protected freedom to be free from unreasonable searches?

A great, well written and well thought out article on the issues of the government coming into our lives to tell us to be safer.


Call for Papers & Presentations – The 21st NERR Symposium

Sunday, March 28th to Tuesday, March 31st, 2009

Now in its 21st year, the Northeastern Recreation Research (NERR) Symposium offers an unparalleled opportunity for individuals representing the governmental, educational and private sectors to share scientific knowledge, management experience and techniques; and positively influence the recreation management and tourism profession. Maintaining our tradition, this year’s meeting will take place once again at The Sagamore – a historic island resort located on west shore of Lake George in the Adirondack region of New York. 

Abstracts: Abstracts for oral presentations or posters are welcome on the following topics:

* Natural resource management

* Historical/cultural resource management

* Emerging and existing trends

* Measurement and forecasting

* Travel and tourism

* Sustainable tourism

* Human dimensions

* Policy development and planning

* Management application

* Methodological & theoretical development

Abstracts should be submitted no later than Friday November 14th, 2008. All abstracts need to be submitted using the online abstract submission interface available at the conference website: www.esf.edu/nerr

Abstracts should be 500 words or less and based on work that will be completed before the conference. Abstracts can be based on any type of data (e.g., surveys, experiments, content or historical analysis). Each abstract should provide a clear statement of the problem or objectives, give a brief description of the methods and substantive results, and end with a clear conclusion. Abstracts that describe proposed research are encouraged and will be reviewed and considered for inclusion in the poster session.

Roundtable Discussions: Once again the symposium will feature a series of Roundtable Discussions designed to get conference attendees together to share information, ideas, best practices, and research insights involving a current topic. Thus far, three Roundtable Discussion Sessions have been proposed for the 2009 conference: 

* Sustainability & Climate Change – Kelly Bricker (Univ of Utah) & John Confer (California Univ of PA)

* Urban Recreation: Challenges & Initiatives – Dave Klenosky (Purdue Univ) & Lynne Westphal (USFS)

* Private Lands & Recreation Access – Walt Kuentzel (Univ of Vermont)

Additional Roundtable Discussion and Management Sessions can be suggested. Please submit ideas for these sessions using the online abstract submission interface available at the NERR website.

Conference Proceedings: Conference attendees will have the opportunity to submit a seven-page paper based on their presentation, poster, or roundtable discussion. These papers will be published in a Forest Service technical report that will be available online thru the NERR and FS websites. 

Student Scholarships: Students are also encouraged to apply for conference scholarships (i.e., an award to cover the cost of conference registration) which are funded in part by Venture Publishing and a raffle held at the conference). Information on how to apply for a conference scholarship can also be found on the NERR website.

Thanks!

David B. Klenosky, Ph.D.

Department of Health & Kinesiology

Purdue University

West Lafayette, IN 47907-2046

(765) 494-0865

Email: klenosky@purdue.edu


SGMA’s Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act Conference Call

SGMA’s Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act Conference Call

September 11, 2008

AGENDA

Black is the original Agenda from the SGMA

Red is my notes from the conference call

Blue are hyperlinks

Introduction and Welcome

    Tom Cove, President and CEO of SGMA

    Mark Granger, Partner, Morrison Mahoney LLP

Overview of CPSC Act

    Paul Rosenlund, Partner, Duane Morris LLP

  1. Very interested in sporting goods and athletic product in general.
    1. Does surveys and statistical surveys of product related injuries and deaths and because sporting goods are at the top they are watched.
  2. Substantial powers over all manufactures, importers, retailers; everyone in the chain of distribution
  3. Products:
    1. Any product sold to the consumer at a household, school or recreation or otherwise
      1. Exception is those governed by other federal agencies
        1. Vehicles
        2. Food & drugs
        3. Airplanes
      2. Some overlap in
        1. Child seats
        2. PFD’s
  4. CPSC job is to review any death and gather of data
    1. Survey’s emergency room info
    2. Consumer reports
    3. Plaintiff’s reports
    4. Manufactures voluntary reports
      1. Voluntary under the law
  5. Enforce better reporting from manufactures
    1. More penalties for manufactures who don’t report on time
  6. How to deal with imports
    1. The proportion of recalls are now imports
  7. New act triggered due to toy recalls but went beyond that
    1. $15 mill can be levied for some penalties
    2. Lower burdens of proof for criminal prosecution
      1. Knowingly imports or manufactures a safety rule
    3. New whistleblower protection for employees to violate
      1. Can’t be fired or have pay reduced
  8. Definitions
    1. Manufacture: any person who manufactures or imports a product
    2. Distribution in commerce: prohibits distributing something commerce. Sell, deliver or even hold for sale for distribution in the future.
    3. Children’s product: children 12 years of age or under

Compliance with and Implications of Phthalate and Lead Restrictions    

Gary Wolensky, Partner, Snell & Wilmer LLP

  1. Section 108 bans all Phthalate in all children’s toys
  2. Child defined as a toy Designed for child 12 years or younger for use when a child plays
    1. Goes into effect 2/12/09
    2. Sporting goods do not fall under the definition of a toy under the act according to the CPSC
  3. Sporting goods are still subject to a lot of new and amended provisions under the act
  4. If a product is a toy under Section 108
    1. Then you must determine that your toy not have more than 1% phthalate (.1% of the total weight or total volume of the product)
  5. You must self certify for at least until 9/09 you must self certify because the rules will not be out yet
  6. Section 101, Lead
    1. Rules go into effect automatically.
      1. 8/14/08 signed so effective 9/13/08 and rules must be issued by this date
      2. 180 days after the act or 2/13/09 new 600 ppm lead limit goes into effect
      3. 365 (1 year) new 300 ppm lead goes into effect and paint goes down to 90 ppm
        1. New lead limits on inaccessible parts and components
      4. 3 years lead limits go down to 100 ppm if technological feasible
        1. Applies to parts individually
          1. Each component will be evaluated separately
    2. Once it becomes mandatory you will be required to test you products for soluble lead

Third Party Certification

    Mark Granger, Partner, Morrison Mahoney LLP

  1. Right now there are only 20 labs in the US that can comply with the requirements for self certification.
    1. There is going to be a big crunch
      1. Labs have to get their applications in now
        1. Deadline is November
      2. If request is not in before the November they will not be accredited
    2. Accreditation is a list of rules on testing
  2. Labs must be out of reach of the manufactures influence
    1. Must be totally independent
  3. Products will not be let into the US without the certifications
    1. There will be a new import surveillance group to check on these products

Label Tracking and Certificates

    Bruce Cranner, Partner, Frilot LLC

  1. Certifications
    1. The act requires that manufactures or labels create a certificate for their products
    2. Two types
      1. A general certificate created by the manufactures based on a 3rd party test or a reasonable testing program that complies with the regulations
      2. Certificate must state the rules, regulations or certifications the label is complying with
      3. Comes into play with 90 days of the act (mid November)
      4. Can be done based on a reasonable testing program
    3. Children’s products certificate
      1. Conforms with the act
      2. Tested by a third party
      3. Must be issued for each children’s product
        1. Lead
        2. Metal jewelry
      4. Must contain
        1. Date and place of manufactures
        2. Date and place of testing
          1. How it was tested
          2. Who tested
        3. Must be available to the buyer of the product
        4. Must be turned over to retailers upon request
        5. Available to turned over to the CPSC or the commissioner of customs
          1. System to file 24 hours before the arrival of the certificate product
    4. New requirement that manufactures tag and label children’s product
      1. Includes the packaging of the product
        1. Must contain distinguishing marks on the product
          1. Batch
          2. Lot
          3. Manufactures date & time
          4. Manufactures location
        2. Ultimate purchase must be able to ascertain
          1. Manufactures date & time
          2. Manufactures location
          3. Batch and lot number
        3. All on the product and the packaging
      2. By 2/14/09

Inventory Issues

    Paul Rosenlund, Partner, Duane Morris LLP

  1. Area with a lot of gray on what, when and where
    1. A lot of the deadlines will slide based on when the CPSC issues the regulations
  2. CPSC did issue preliminary deadlines on an excel spreadsheet
  3. Xmas time proposed deadline for lead
  4. Labels 1 year after deadline after the date of enactment
  5. Toy safety standard F9 63-07 apply to all products manufactures after 2/10/09
  6. Lead is effective immediately and applies to existing inventory
  7. Phthalate applies 100 days after enactment, 2/10/09 to all products distributed in commerce
    1. Effectively if too much Phthalate must be destroyed or fixed after 2/10/09
      1. The act prohibits selling, exporting or distributing
  8. 3 wheel all terrain vehicles banned now!
  9. 4 wheel all terrain vehicles new rules
  10. 90 day testing??

Question and Answer Session

    E-mail Mark Granger at MGranger@morrisonmahoney.com with any questions     you would like to have discussed at this time.

What about state rules and regulations that are more stringent than the Federal rules

    Gary Wolensky: state law will not be pre-empted by the federal act. State law will still apply, except for Phthalate.

    The act is it pre-emptive by CA Proposition 65

Any damage claims (plaintiff’s claims) is still based on state law

Sporting good designed for educational use, is that a toy?

    Gary Wolensky: Get advice, go through the product and product line and figure out whether the article is sporting good or something else.

    Personal use, consumption use or enjoyment in or around personal residence, school recreation or otherwise

What about certifications provided by foreign countries?

    Barring some sort of treaty or CPSC agreement those certifications will not work and must be certified under US rules

    Not just a function of what the product is made of

        Small parts

        Children’s products

        Everything will require 3rd party certification

    You will need to find lawyers skilled in this and independent labs skilled in this

Paul Rosenlund: there will be a separate set of rules for foreign labs

    EU standard will not exempt you from the CPSC

Is children’s footwear children’s toys?

    Arguably under the definition it is a consumer product and used to play.

    Can it end up in the kid’s mouth, then it might be a toy

Inaccessible parts made of Phthalate or lead?

    Inaccessible part the issue is the part really inaccessible? You are comparing the percentage concentration to the totality to the product whether accessible or not.

Probably specific regulations on accessible issues

How do I tell if I am a child’s product toy or just a sporting good?

    Clearly sporting goods fall within the definition of child’s products

    The critical inquiry is “is your product a toy or sporting goods”

        Look at the intended use

        Look at the advertising and marketing

        Is it used in team sports or individual sports

        Is it cute, colorful etc is a toy

        Are your instructions, warnings, etc aimed at a child above age 12?

        Do the instructions say only for use by children over age 12?

Certificates?

    A lot of information is not known yet on labels and certificates. Waiting on CPSC to provide more guidance.

    Everyone who manufactures a product must be on the certificate

        Where it came from, who manufactured it

    Tracking label must provide opportunity for the ultimate purchase to determine manufactures date time and location and batch run and time.

Paul: another provision of the act CPSC now has authority without a complaint or investigation the right to ask any importer retailer or manufactures for all supply chain information including component suppliers.

Gary W. as of this morning on the CPSC the PowerPoint’s are up from the presentations made by the CPSC last week.

Ended at 12: 30 PM MST

SGMA Conference Call Sponsored by:

KEY CONTACT INFORMATION

Bruce Cranner     Mark Granger      Tom Cove

Frilot LLC     Morrison Mahoney LLP             SGMA

504.599.8151         617.439.7518          202.349.9422


BCranner@frilot.com
MGranger@morrisonmahoney.com
TCove@sgma.com

 

Paul Rosenlund     Gary Wolensky             Bill Sells

Duane Morris LLP     Snell & Wilmer LLP             SGMA

415.957.3178     714.427.7022          202.349.9417


PSRosenlund@duanemorris.com
GWolensky@swlaw.com     BSells@sgma.com


Another case where anger starts and continues a lawsuit.

Cheryl Swanson is appealing a lawsuit she is fighting pro se against the Boy Scouts of America. Pro Se means without an attorney. Swanson has all ready lost her case at the trial court level and at the Ohio Appellate Court. She claims she was injured at a Boy Scout Camp on a slip ‘n’ slide. She alleged received a traumatic brain injury.

Her first case and her appeal were dismissed because she had not filed her lawsuit within the time allowed. Legally, she had missed the statute of limitations. The statute of limitations is the time within which a lawsuit must be filed. In Ohio the statute of limitations to file a tort claim is two years. Tort is the name given to lawsuits filed for personal injuries. This suit was filed five years after the accident.

What is interesting is the plaintiff’s statements in the article. “…she filed the appeal because she’s right. “They were at fault,” Swanson said of the Boy Scouts organization. “They knew they were at fault and they’re dragging it out.” See Case against Scouts heads to higher court

This is an angry person. You read the article and it is clear where the anger comes from. You can read clearly that the anger is what is fueling this litigation.

Statutes of limitations are cut and dried and the plaintiff’s chance at success is nil in this case. She probably has been told that, but anger can fuel the energy to go up against an insurmountable fortress.


IQ Test not required to enter National Park Service Land

The National Park Service Morning Report for July 24, 2008 is reporting the arrest of several men for violating the NPS rules on commercial filming in the park. See Fines issued after fatality for failing to have proper permits on USFS land for more information on the requirements for commercial filming on NPS land. In this case, I suspect the filming was the least likely problem when the violators were spotted.

Five men holding guns, two of which were AK-47’s had a sixth man handcuffed and on his knees. They appeared to be executing the handcuffed man.

The men, ages 18 to 24 where using BB guns, except the AK-47’s were real. There was also a tripod and camera; however it would be easy to miss the tripod when you are looking at AK-47’s.

See the full report below.

Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area (GA)

Illegal Filmmakers Cited For Weapons, Permit Violations

A park visitor spotted five men with assault rifles and pistols in the woods near a popular visitor area early on the afternoon of July 11th. The five men had a sixth man on his knees with hands handcuffed behind his back and were pointing two AK-47’s at his head. They also had a video camera on a tripod nearby and were filming this apparent execution. Local police responded and detained the men, ages 18 to 24, at gunpoint. Ranger Jose Rochez also responded and helped officers collect evidence and conduct interviews. It turned out that the six were filming a movie without a permit, using several BB/pellet guns and two real AK-47s. The owner of those guns was arrested, while the others received violation notices for weapons and permit violations. [Submitted by Scott Pfenninger, Chief Ranger]


Therapeutic Recreation Educator’s Conference

TREC II is now available for registration at http://www.okstate.edu/education/trec/

June 18th thru 21st, 2009, educators and practitioners interested in therapeutic recreation curricula will join together on the campus of Oklahoma State University in Stillwater, Oklahoma. The conference, which will occur over two full days on June 19th & 20th, is sponsored by the American Therapeutic Recreation Association (ATRA) and the National Therapeutic Recreation Society (NTRS), a branch of the National Recreation and Park Association. The conference will be hosted by the Therapeutic Recreation Association of Oklahoma (TRAO) and Oklahoma State University. The focus of this conference is to build upon the TREC 2005 conference document and to address new issues which have come to the forefront of the profession since that time. The potential for the publication of a refereed manuscript also exists for conference presenters and discussions are currently taking place with the editors of the TRJ to ensure the possibility of a special issue devoted to Higher Education. The Conference Program Committee, Chaired by Dr. Tim Passmore at Oklahoma State University will be sending out a call for papers within the next month.

For additional information or specific questions please contact Dr. Tim Passmore at tim.passmore@okstate.edu or Dr. Jerry Jordan at jerry.jordan@okstate.edu for additional information.


California and Pacific Southwest Recreation and Park Training Conference

California and Pacific Southwest Recreation and Park Training Conference

Leisure Education & Research Symposium Call for Abstracts

March 6, 2009

Santa Clara Convention Center, Santa Clara, CA

Description

The Leisure Education & Research Symposium provides a forum for exchange and discussion of new knowledge developed through research. The Symposium welcomes studies, both theoretical and applied research that contributes to the development of the leisure, recreation, and tourism professions.

Date

The 2009 Leisure Education & Research Symposium has been scheduled on Friday, March 6 from 9:00am – 4:30 pm. Due to the limited number of time slots available for oral presentation, there will be an opportunity for poster session to allow more researchers to share their research findings.

Abstract Submission

Research abstracts are invited which report either empirical studies or contribute to the development and refinement of conceptual and theoretical perspectives related to leisure, recreation, or tourism. Please note the following conditions for submission of abstracts:

  1. Only completed studies on empirical, conceptual, or theoretical aspects of leisure, recreation, or tourism will be considered.
  2. Graduate students whose thesis research will be completed by March 2009 are also encouraged to submit.
  3. The lead author must present the paper or arrange for a co-author to present the paper.
  4. All abstracts for oral presentations and poster presentations will be blind and peer reviewed by the symposium co-chairs and a review committee. Submissions will be assessed progressively to ensure quick turn around.

Abstract Requirements

  1. A one-page cover sheet containing the title, author(s), contact information, and affiliate institution information. Please indicate whether the abstract should be reviewed as an oral presentation or a poster presentation.
  2. The abstract should not be longer than ONE single-sided page: 1″ margins; 10 to 12-point font size and 500 words maximum. Please do not put the author’s name(s) on the abstract.
  • Empirical papers must be based on completed research and must contain the following elements: Introduction, Method, Results and Discussion.
  • Conceptual or theoretical papers should include a comparable system of organization and/or a theoretical framework.

Accepted Abstracts

  1. An author must attend the Symposium to present the paper if it is accepted. Due to limited oral presentation slots available, please do not submit an abstract unless it is certain that this responsibility can be fulfilled.
  2. During the presentation, 10 copies of the abstract or completed paper with the author'(s) name and affiliation must be available to the audience during the presentation.
  3. If the abstract is accepted, conference educational session registration for the author is complimentary, only one per abstract, for March 6th only.
  4. The author is allowed 15 minutes for the presentation, followed by 5 minutes for questions and discussion.
  5. The use of audio-visual aids is strongly encouraged. An IBM compatible notebook PC with CD-ROM and 3.5″ floppy drive and a LCD projector will be available. If other A-V equipment is needed, please notify either of the two co-chairs.
  6. For full consideration abstracts should be received by October 3, 2009
    by 5:00 pm EST. E-mail submissions are encouraged. Please save your work as a MS Word or Rich Text document and send as an attachment. Submission by fax is acceptable if followed by an original.
  7. E-mail notification of acceptance will be made by December 5, 2008.

Leisure Education and Research Symposium Co-Chairs

The 2009 Leisure Education & Research Symposium has two designated Co-Chairs.

The First Co-Chair is Richard O.B. Makopondo, PhD., MIH. Email: Richard.makopondo@csueastbay.edu

The Second Co-Chair is Suzy Ross, PhD., CTRS, RTC. Email.sross@casa.sjsu.edu

Please Submit Abstracts to:

Richard O. B Makopondo, Leisure Education and Research Symposium Co-Chair

Department of Leadership in Hospitality and Leisure Services

College of Education and Allied Studies

California State University, East Bay

AE 246, 25800 Carlos Bee Boulevard,

Hayward, CA 94542

Phone: (510) 885-3043 Dept Office

Fax No. (510) 885-7413

Richard.makopondo@csueastbay.edu


Trade Association of Paddlesports (TAPS) and Paddlesports Industry Association (PIA) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
TO COMBINE
PADDLESPORTS INDUSTRY ORGANIZATIONS

This Memorandum of Understanding shall serve as a nonbinding statement of the mutual desires and intentions of the Trade Association of Paddlesports (“TAPS”) and the Professional Paddlesports Association, Inc. d/b/a the Paddlesports Industry Association (“PIA”) to combine operations and memberships into one paddlesports industry association to build and strengthen the industry and serve the needs of their memberships. As contemplated, this transaction will have the following significant terms and conditions which will be incorporated into a mutually acceptable Asset Purchase Agreement (“Agreement”):

1. Prior to, and during the period from the date of this Memorandum of Understanding through the closing of the transaction, it is anticipated that any party may disclose or reveal to any other, either orally or in writing, or by inspection, confidential information as to the respective operations of TAPS and PIA that would be helpful in evaluating the proposed transaction. Such “Confidential Information” to be disclosed or inspected, as the case may be, would include information as may be supplied by the respective parties that is not generally ascertainable from public or published information or trade sources. The parties agree to retain in confidence, all such “Confidential Information” transmitted by them to any other party, and not to disclose to others, or permit the use or disclosure of, any such Confidential Information obtained from or revealed by the other party.

2. Recognizing that cooperation and coordinated communications will be essential to achieving unification of the two organizations, the parties agree that from the date of this Memorandum of Understanding through the earlier of December 31, 2008 or the preparation, execution and closing of the Agreement, the parties will collaborate and cooperate to facilitate the completion of the transaction, using their best efforts to blend the cultures of the organizations, their Boards, and their memberships, in order for the unified organization to immediately commence operations in a cooperative manner.

3. Recognizing that industry perceptions are critical to the success of this effort, the transaction is to be characterized as an industry unification. The transaction is not to be characterized as a takeover, acquisition, purchase, or similar terms indicating that either party is stronger than, or superior to, the other. Neither party, nor their Board members, shall disparage the other party or its Board members or personnel. Any statements about the transaction to the public or the memberships of either organization will require the prior approval of the other organization. The primary contacts to negotiate, coordinate, and publicly speak about or comment on the transaction will be one individual from each existing association, likely to be Landis Arnold and Michael Prom. The parties will jointly create and follow a written communications plan for the transaction, to include immediate joint announcement of this Memorandum of Understanding, membership notifications and meetings, and public announcements. It is the mutually understood goal of this process to complete the MOU and announce its intentions and meanings to the industry no later than the Outdoor Retailer Show in August 2008.

4. If unification discussions are terminated for any reason, the parties will issue a joint public statement and neither party shall make any other comment or independent statements to its membership, third parties, press or the public regarding the transaction or its failure to close. Such termination shall leave the parties in status quo, with the “Let’s Go Paddle” Joint Marketing Plan to remain in place.

5. The existing TAPS entity, including its federal tax exemption, will serve as the vehicle for the combined organizations and will sometimes be referred to herein as the “Unified Organization.” This will avoid starting over with a new entity and obtaining a new tax exemption, thereby saving the combined organizations’ capital, simplifying the transaction, and providing control over the timing of the combination. It is also intended to allow for select assets and liabilities to be included in the combination, as representatives of the parties discussed in meetings in Madison, Wisconsin, on March 7, 2008. The organizational documents of the Unified Organization, including Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws and Board Policies shall be amended and readied for approval and implementation prior to, and as a condition of, the closing. The intent is for these documents to be industry best practices, rather than those of either constituent party.

6. PIA will convey all of its assets, other than its insurance subsidiary known as RIA, and its interest in Paddlesports Publishing, Inc., to the Unified Organization. Both of these residual assets will be wound up or sold, and liquidated by PIA. Proceeds from these dispositions will be applied, first, to the liquidation of any residual PIA liabilities. PIA shall then be dissolved as soon as practical and any net residual assets will be contributed to the Unified Organization. Such net residual contributions, after being used to reimburse accrued Unification expenses, shall be earmarked by the Unified Organization’s Board, to the extent the Board deems it fiscally responsible in light of other budget priorities, to support the business needs of the paddlesports rental and outfitter sector, to the extent approved by a vote of three-quarters of the Board members.

7. The Unified Organization will assume the following PIA liabilities: credit card debt, not to exceed the amount currently outstanding, and term debt, not to exceed the amount currently outstanding, and PIA’s employment contract with Matt Menashes.

8. PIA member benefits contracts or agreements will be assumed (or renegotiated) by the Unified Organization, and in its discretion, to the extent they do not conflict with existing TAPS/OIA member benefit programs, and will not conflict with or hinder the Unified Organization’s ability to secure support from third parties such as Outdoor Retailer or Outdoor Industry Association. These include affinity/benefit partners including US Bank/Elavon merchant credit card processing; GE Money consumer financing; GTS transportation services, CBIZ and MMIC health insurance marketing. The Unified Organization will also negotiate a new shared membership agreement with the American Canoe Association.

9. The Joint Marketing Agreement between TAPS and PIA will be terminated as a self standing program at the closing, with the understanding that the Unified Organization will continue to operate the “Let’s Go Paddle” cooperative marketing campaign, and pursue the underlying mission of that agreement after the closing for the benefit of the combined memberships.

10. The parties will jointly agree on which member programs to retain, it being the general intent of the parties to retain PIA’s National School for Paddleports Business, the Paddlesports Pro conference series, the Certified Paddlesports Professional program, and Disaster Assistance programs, and TAPS’ current program offerings. Ultimately, it is understood that the ongoing program slate will require the Unified board’s support and approval.

11. In order to ensure that the best interests and productivity of the Unified Organization are met in a cost effective manner, an evaluation of support staff and their salaries must be conducted. It is the goal of the parties to honor PIA’s remaining contract term with Matt Menashes, and to retain Michael Pardy as a full-time or part-time contractor at a compensation level that is proportionate to full-time equivalent pay parity with Mr. Menashes. These individuals would hold the roles of operational directors with separate responsibility areas, reporting to the Chairman of the Unified board, however they will together be responsible for cooperating, designing and implementing an industry unification plan. The parties recognize the financial pressure this will put on the Unified Organization, and will work to modify employment relationships (on a parity basis) and consolidate all staff and what have heretofore been outsourced projects in the two directors. No other PIA employees or contractors would join the Unified Organization. It is contemplated that the Unified board would advertise for and seek applications for one Executive Director to commence employment in Spring 2010.

12. All members of both existing organizations will be issued memberships in the Unified Organization, valid through the expiration of their existing memberships in PIA and TAPS. Thereafter, memberships will be offered on terms offered by the Unified Organization, which terms shall be agreed upon and announced prior to the closing.

13. At the time of closing the transaction, PIA will terminate the memberships of its members, discontinue operations, enter into a non-competition agreement, liquidate its assets, dissolve and distribute residual funds as soon as reasonably possible yet while maximizing the value of its residual assets.

14. At the time of closing the transaction, the name of the Unified Organization will be changed to a mutually acceptable name, with the tagline “The Paddlesport Industry’s Association” (to be spelled out, and not printed or stated as PIA initials). Its Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws will be amended to include terms agreed upon by the parties, and its Board of directors shall be reconstituted to include members from both organizations mutually agreed upon by the parties through 2009 (the “Reorganization”). The parties acknowledge that PIA’s Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws have undergone extensive review and should be given due consideration as the model for the Unified Organization.

15. The closing of the transaction would occur by November 30, 2008. Public announcement of the MOU and its timeline and process will occur by or at the Outdoor Retailer Trade Show in August 2008.

16. TAPS will pay for the preparation of the Agreement and services in connection with the closing by Faegre & Benson LLP, which shall act as counsel to TAPS and the Unified Organization. Faegre & Benson LLP shall be available, if requested by PIA, and to be paid for out of the Unified Organization (or by PIA if the closing fails to occur) to assist PIA with legal compliance in obtaining membership approval and winding up PIA’s operations. If the combination fails to close for any reason other than the wrongful refusal of TAPS to close, PIA shall reimburse TAPS for one-half of the legal expenses incurred by TAPS in connection with the preparation of this Memorandum of Understanding and with the transaction. In the event of any dispute between the parties that cannot be resolved by the parties, Faegre & Benson LLP shall withdraw from the representation and shall not represent either party in connection with such dispute.

17. Promptly upon the execution of this Memorandum of Understanding by all parties, the unification working group shall jointly prepare a comprehensive transition plan, membership integration plan and program, including networking and membership education benefits, detailed pro forma budget and assumptions, and such other documents as are necessary, and Landis Arnold and Mike Prom shall prepare a proposed combined Board slate. Faegre & Benson LLP shall prepare the Agreement and required ancillary documents.

18. It is understood that the Agreement and the Reorganization will need to be approved by the Boards of Directors of TAPS and PIA, and by the members of PIA, and that the Reorganization will need to be approved by the members of TAPS. Information about the combination including such disclosures as are reasonably necessary to allow for informed votes by the parties shall be mutually agreed upon prior to distribution.

It is understood that this Memorandum of Understanding is intended to be, and shall be construed only as, a summary of intentions evidencing the discussions between TAPS and PIA to the date hereof; and the respective rights and obligations of TAPS and PIA remain to be defined in the Agreement, into which this Memorandum of Understanding and all prior discussions shall be merged; provided, however, that the respective obligations of the parties under Paragraphs 1 and 16 of this Memorandum of Understanding shall be binding when this Memorandum of Understanding shall be executed and delivered. Absent an Agreement, neither party shall be obligated to proceed with this unification effort.

Dated: August ___, 2008

TRADE ASSOCIATION OF PADDLESPORTS INDUSTRY PADDLESPORTS ASSOCIATION
By:____________________________ By:____________________________

Title:__________________________ Title:__________________________


2008 Colorado River Basin Science and Resource Management Symposium Deadline Extended for Abstracts

The deadline for abstracts for the 2008 Colorado River Basin Science and Resource Management Symposium has been extended to September 22. For submission guidelines, please visit: http://www.watereducation.org/userfiles/scienceabstracts2.doc

This 2 ½ day Symposium, Coming Together: Coordination of Science and Restoration Activities for the Colorado River Ecosystem will be held November 18-20, 2008 at the Doubletree Resort Hotel in Scottsdale, Ariz.

This basin-wide Symposium will promote the exchange of information on research and management activities related to the restoration/conservation of the Colorado River and its major tributaries from the headwaters to the U.S./Mexico border.

Plenary sessions and concurrent technical sessions, vendors and poster sessions will be featured. Registration is $250 – fee includes lunches and reception on November 18 & 19. A PDF copy of the draft program along with a flyer for the event is attached above.

We look forward to seeing you there!


Introducing JUPTRR A New Kind of Electronic Journal


We are pleased to announce the publication of the Journal of Unconventional Parks, Tourism & Recreation Research (JUPTRR). We hope you share in our excitement about the launch of this new venue for publication of recreation research.

JUPTRR is designed as a resource for educators, professionals, and students in recreation, parks, and tourism. As with all academic journals, manuscripts accepted to JUPTRR provide research that contributes to the body of knowledge in a field. What makes this journal unique is the focus on unconventional methodologies and topics.

The journal adheres to standard academic practices whereby all research manuscripts go through a blind, peer-review process. We are slightly unconventional in that submissions are sent to two associate editors and one “tyro editor” for review. A tyro is someone new to an activity or learning a skill, and the tyro editor designation includes doctoral students and recreation practitioners. If you are interested in serving on the editorial board, please complete the form at http://juptrr.asp.radford.edu/Editor_Form.htm.


All articles can be accessed free of charge at http://juptrr.asp.radford.edu/Current.htm. In the first issue you will find an exploration of prostitution as leisure, a study measuring wisdom and values of teens in a service-learning environment, another examining the benefits of half-day challenge course participation on leadership and work efficacy, and a theoretical model of experiential andragogy.

CALL FOR PAPERS

Submission deadline for the next issue is August 15th. Applied researchers, first-time authors, practitioners, graduate students, and researchers with a sense of exploration are encouraged to participate.

Email articles to juptrr@radford.edu in Word or rich text format. Include a cover page with a manuscript title and complete list of authors. Provide contact information for primary author (i.e., institution, mailing address, email, and telephone). Author names should not appear elsewhere in the manuscript to assist in blind review. Include an abstract of 120 words or less. Papers must be in English and formatted using the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (5th edition) and the APA Style Guide for Electronic References.

Articles submitted to JUPTRR should not be under review by any other journal or previously published. Published articles will be archived and may be used and shared in accordance with fair-use provisions of U.S. copyright law.

For additional information, please visit the Journal’s website at http://juptrr.asp.radford.edu or contact us at juptrr@radford.edu.



Published in cooperation with the National Recreation and Park Association


2009 International Conference on Strategic Management Focusing on Environment Protection and Eco-Tourism

Call for Papers

2009 International Conference on Strategic Management (2009 ICSM)

Focusing on Environment Protection and Eco-Tourism

http://www.icsm.com.cn

Sichuan University, Chengdu, P.R. China

Jiu Zhaigou

Conference Venue : Jiuzhaigou Valley—“A paradise in the Earth”, a listed nature reserve of world heritage by UNESCO
in 1992.

http://www.frommers.com/destinations/jiuzhaigou/3415010001.html

Conference Host: Business School, Sichuan University—one of the top ten business schools in China.

Conference Registration: Chengdu— an ancient city and capital of Sichuan Province in southwestern China with 10 million population

Date:
June 25-29, 2009

Conference Theme:

Strategic Management Engineering: Enterprise, Environment and Crisis

Strategic management is a growing professional and research field in both business and the public sector. The goal of the 2nd annual (2009) international conference on strategic management is to discuss strategies for innovation and sustainable development, balancing growth of large-sized, small and medium sized enterprises and the promotion of eco-tourism with concern for the protection of the environment as the strategic base. The conference seeks to provide a forum for distinguished speakers from academia, government and industry to discuss new approaches for balancing enterprise development with balanced-growth, share experiences of success and failure in enterprises strategic management; explore changes and promote international co-operation in the field of strategic management of enterprises, sustainable development and eco-tourism in China’s western development, especially in light of economic globalization.

Place: Sichuan University & Jiu Zhaigou County, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, P.R. China

Institutions:

Specially Sponsored by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China

 

Co-sponsored by:

 

        Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, P. R. China Business School, Sichuan University & Strategy and Development Research Center

        County of Jiu Zhaigou, Chengdu city, Sichuan Province, P. R. China

        University of Minnesota, USA; Department of Forest Resources and Tourism Center

        The Nature Conservancy; Asia Pacific

        University of St. Thomas, USA; Opus College of Business

 

2009 ICSM Honorary Chair: Shaker A. Zahra, Robert E. Buuck Chair of Entrepreneurship and Professor of strategy and organization in the Carlson School of Management at the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA

2009 ICSM Chair: Professor Xie Heping, President of Sichuan University;

2009 Vice Chairs: Professor Xu Jiuping, Vice Dean of Business School, Sichuan University,

                 Mr. Yang Hongshou, President of Jiu Zhaigou County

 

2009 ICSM Organizing Committee Chair: Professor Yang Jiang, Executive Vice Dean of Business School of Sichuan University, China; Vice Chair: Professor Jie Xiaowen, Business School, Sichuan University, China, and Mary Maloney Assistant PhD. Opus College of Business, University of St Thomas, St Paul, MN USA.

 

2009 ICSM Academic Chair: Professor Xu Erming, Vice-Dean of the Graduate School and the supervisor of the PhD candidates of Renmin University of China, Beijing, China, also Director of Small and Medium Enterprise Research Center of Renmin University of China, Beijing, China

Ingrid Schneider, Professor and Director Tourism Center, University of Minnesota Department of Forest Resources, Minneapolis, MN USA 

 

2009 ICSM Academic Co Chair: Assistant Professor Mary Maloney, Opus College of Business, University of St Thomas, Minneapolis, MN USA

 

2009 ICSM Members of Academic Committee:

Lee Munnich, Humphrey Institute for Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, USA

Jay Ebben, School of Business, University of St Thomas, USA

Professor Tang Xiaowo, Sichuan Educational Bureau, P. R. China

Professor Chen Aimin, Vice-president of Sichuan University, P. R. China

Professor Ding Renzhong, Vice-president of South Western University of Finance and Economics

Professor Du Kentang, Economics School, Sichuan University, P. R. China

Professor Zeng Xianzhang, Nan Kai University, P. R. China

Professor Huang Dengshi, Vice-dean of Business School, Southwest Jiao Tong University, P. R. China

Professor Xu Jiuping, Vice-dean of Business School, Sichuan University, P. R. China

Professor Ren Peiyu, Vice-dean of Business School, Sichuan University, P. R. China

Professor Li Guangjin, Vice-dean of Business School, Sichuan University, P. R. China

Professor Jie Xiaowen, Business School, Sichuan University, P. R. China

Professor Chen Weizheng, Business School, Sichuan University, P. R. China

Professor Zhu Xinmin, Business School, Sichuan University, P. R. China

Professor Mao Daowei, Business School, Sichuan University, P. R. China

Professor Gu Xin, Business School, Sichuan University, P. R. China

Professor Li Shiming, School of Management, University of Electronic Science and Technology, P. R. China

Professor Shi Yingping, School of Tourism, Sichuan University, P. R. China

 

2009 ICSM U.S. Coordinator: Dr. Thomas Walkington, University of Minnesota Carlson School of Management, Human Resources and Industrial Relations, Minneapolis, MN USA

 

2009 ICSM Secretariat:

Secretary-general: Professor Zhang Liming (00)86-13709031166

Secretary: Zhao Lu (00)86-13550079339; Yan Shu (00)86-13880385281; Zhang Liangliang (00)86-13880646283

 

Paper topics include but are not limited to:

        Environment and Crisis Management

        Innovation in the Tourism industry
and Strategies for Sustainable Regional
Development

        Strategies for Eco-tourism and Cluster Development in Jiu Zhaigou District

        SMEs’ Entrepreneurship and Development Strategies in Transition period

        Strategies for balancing Enterprise and Sustainable Development in Western China in Transition period

        Self-innovation and the Strategy of Sustainable
Enterprise Development

        Globalization and the Strategy of Enterprise Development

        IT and the Strategy of Sustainable Enterprise Development

 

Special Instructions:

All abstracts and papers should be written in English. Abstracts should be between 500 and 800 words, prepared in 11 point Times Roman font, and use 1 inch margins on all page sides. Abstracts invited for full papers should be expanded to between 5000 and 8000 words and processed in Microsoft Word 2000 or higher edition.

 

All accepted papers will be published by Press of Sichuan University and indexed by ISTP (index to Scientific and Technical Proceedings) and by ISSHPIndex to Social Sciences & Humanities Proceedings. (ISTP and ISSHP are two foundational Index of ISI Web of Knowledge in the USA. (The acceptance of index depends on the quality of papers)

 

Significant Deadlines and Schedule:

        Author Profile and Abstract due (500-800 words):    October 15, 2008            

      Due date for full accepted papers December 15, 2008

        Notification for accepted papers /        

and Confirmation of participation                 February 28, 2009

˜ International conference
in Sichuan University


June 25 –29, 2009

and Jiu Zhaigou District

        

Papers from inside China should be sent by email directly to

icsm2007@163.com, rcsd_scu@hotmail.com

 

Any problem related to papers, please contact:

Professor Jie Xiaowen

Business School of Sichuan University

Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China

Post Code: 610064

Tel: 86-28-85410771

Fax: 86-28-85410771

 

Papers from outside China should be sent by email directly to: walki004@umn.edu

Dr. Thomas Walkington

Human Resources and Industrial Relations

Carlson School of Management

University of Minnesota

321 19th Ave. South

Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA

For more information please visit 2009 ICSM Conference website: http://www.icsm.com.cn


 

 

Author Profile (First Author)

Name:
Gender:

Position:
The title of a technical post:

Job and work place:

Address (including post code):

Tel:

Email:

Title of paper (For Chinese participator: both in Chinese and English):

 

Abstract: (500-800 words; 11 point Times Roman font)

 
 

Ingrid E. Schneider, Ph.D.

Professor & Director

Department of Forest Resources & Tourism Center

University of Minnesota

115 Green Hall

1530 Cleveland Avenue North

St. Paul, MN 55108

(v) 612 624 2250

(f) 612 625 5212


Integrating Human Dimensions into Fisheries and Wildlife Management

Join us in the Colorado Rockies!

2008 Pathways to Success Conference & Training:

Integrating Human Dimensions into Fisheries and Wildlife Management

Increasing human capacity for global human-wildlife coexistence

Still accepting posters

Registration rates for the Pathways to Success: Integrating Human Dimensions into Fish and Wildlife Management Conference and Training will increase on August 2, 2008. If you have not registered and wish to take advantage of the lower rates, please do so by the end of the day on Friday, August 1, 2008.

If you choose to remit the registration fees by check you must fill out the registration form online by August 1 and get us the check by August15th.

Instructions for check or wire transfer are available on the registration page at the conference website.

The conference program, custom itinerary builder and information about special trainings and field trips are all available on the conference website at www.hdfwconference.org.

If you have any questions or need more information, please email the conference coordinator, Esther Duke, at conference@warnercnr.colostate.edu or call her at 970-491-2197.

We hope to see you in the Colorado Rockies!

Mike Manfredo

Conference Co-Chair, Pathways to Success Integrating Human Dimension into Fish and Wildlife Management

Human Dimensions of Natural Resources Department

Colorado State University

Jerry Vaske

Conference Co-Chair, Pathways to Success Integrating Human Dimension into Fish and Wildlife Management

Human Dimensions of Natural Resources Department

Colorado State University


Esther Duke

Coordinator, Pathways to Success: Integrating Human Dimension into Fish and Wildlife Management Conference

Human Dimensions of Natural Resources Department

Colorado State University


Fines issued after fatality for failing to have proper permits on USFS land

The Aspen Daily News is reporting that three people have been cited in conjunction with the death of Wallace Westfeldt. The citations are for filming on US Forest Service land without the proper film permits. The Story, Three cited in fatal film shootstates the fines will be $500 each.

Usfs shield 125x125

Image via Wikipedia

The citations came after the investigation into the death of Westfeldt. Westfeldt died while filming in Tonar Bowl outside of Aspen Highlands ski area. Tonar died after jumping off a cliff for a film shoot for the Aspen Ski Company. See Snowboarder killed in Highlands backcountry.

Two stories in the Aspen Daily News hinted that the Aspen Ski Company knew they had violated the law. See: SkiCo vows to ‘more carefully scrutinize permit compliance’ and Fatal Tonar shoot may have broke law.

All commercials activities that occur on US Forest Service lands (as well as NPS and BLM lands) must be done with a commercial permit. The permits are issued to make sure the land is not destroyed, the visitor experience is not altered and that no risk is posed for a visitor. The USFS also receives income from issuing the permits.

Information about Special Use Permits can be found at the US Forest Special Use website. Information on filming on Forest Service lands can be found at http://www.fs.fed.us/specialuses/special_film.shtml.

There is a difference between taking a photograph or movie for your personal use or to bore your friends and neighbors after you get home. If you are going to use the photographs or video for commercial purposes, to promote a commercial venture or business you must have a permit from all federal land management agencies.

The three men can either pay the fine or within thirty days contest the charges in Federal Court. The charges are a Class B Misdemeanor.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Wow, someone apologized

I wrote about Adam Dzialo in Serious Disconnect: Why people sue. If you read this post, please read the comment. Comments: Recreation Law: Serious Disconnect: Why people sue. Adam Dzialo’s father left a post saying the college finally apologized after 9 years.

The Portsmouth Herald Mass News reported in Family of boy injured at camp reaches $936,000 settlementthat the case settled.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Two reasons why you want the release to be upheld in court

1.    Because you want to support release law

2.    Because idiots, or better drunk idiots should not be able to sue.

The New York Daily News is reporting two individuals have filed suit against a Manhattan bar, Johnny Utah’sover injuries they received when they were

Cover of "DVD Dance Pack Collection (Grea...

Cover via Amazon

thrown from a mechanical bull.

See Woman tossed from bull ride sues NY restaurant, Mechanical Bull Suit Goes To Court, Raging bull rider suing restaurant and Johnny Utah’s slapped with second lawsuit over mechanical ‘menace’.

You first have to overcome the issue of a “cowboy bar’ in Manhattan. If that bothers you definitely don’t go the bar’s website, the theme from old spaghetti’s westerns and cows mooing alone will crack you up…..or at least those of us who live in the west. But then you realize it is just a bar that has held onto a theme….for twenty years. Urban Cowboy?

The first patron is claiming that the bar should not have allowed him to ride the bull inebriated. Of course it is a bar where most people go to drink and become inebriated. The suit describes the bull as a “danger” because it lacks the “proper safeguards and padding to break falls.” The writer describes the bull as “furry with padded horns.”

Another article describes the second rider suing claiming “”assault and battery” because she was allowed to ride the bull at Johnny Utah’s in Rockefeller Center.”

So why am I writing about these lawsuits. Not a lot of outdoor recreation in New York City that most of my articles are about. However in both cases the patrons signed a release before climbing on the “dangerous beast.” New York law is always tricky at best because of General Obligation Law § 5-326 Releases not valid in places of amusement for a fee. This statute states that releases are void if the signor paid a fee to enjoy the amusement. Here the issue will be did the bar charge to ride the bull or to get through the door.

Releases are also interpreted narrowly and that interpretation varies based on the court. See Case Brief: New York upholds release for negligence claim with purchase of paraglider, Poorly crafted release and court’s interpretation of certification dooms defendant, Case Brief: New York Court Invalidates Release Lacking Clear Language, and NY State Law Does Not Prohibit Releases in All Cases.

Someplace there is a cowboy in Wyoming picking him or herself up off the ground after being violently thrown from a real bull with real horns who is mean or maybe just mad and who landed on hard dirt. No padded horns, no padded landing area just doing what real cowboys do. Oh, and no release because real cowboys assume the risk and cowboy up.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

CALL FOR EDITOR

Journal of Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Leadership
JOREL

The Association of Outdoor Recreation and Education, The Wilderness Education Association and the Western Kentucky UniversityResearch Foundation have

Western Kentucky University

Image via Wikipedia

developed a new peer reviewed journal for the outdoor profession.

Journal Philosophy & Purpose: Given the current culture of many academic journals JOREL will fulfill a major gap created by the distinction placed on “practitioner” versus “academic” shared knowledge. The purpose of JOREL is to deliver best practices and research based information to the outdoor community in one publication.

Journal Format: JOREL, a subscription-based electronic journal, will create greater accessibility to a global audience while maintaining reasonable subscription rates. In addition, using tools from The Berkeley Electronic Press will help ensure compliance with web content accessibility standards.

Primary Editor Responsibilities: The Editor’s primary responsibilities include ensuring manuscript quality, recruiting manuscript submissions, assigning reviewers, tracking submissions and reviewer progress, communication with authors and seeing that publication deadlines are met. JOREL will utilize resources from The Berkeley Electronic Press, such as EdiKit Back Office Solutions to assist the editor in these duties.

The Editor will work with a six member advisory group comprised of two representatives from WEA, AORE and WKU.

Editor Salary: $3,000 annually.

Publication Schedule: Three issues annually.

Editor Qualifications: The successful candidate will have a strong publication record and manuscript reviewing experience.

Interested parties should send CV highlighting publication and manuscript reviewing history to Dr. Thomas Stuessy at: stuessyt@greenmtn.edu

Applications due via e-mail July 21, 5:00 P.M.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Another Litigation versus Criminal example

I’ve all ready commented about this issue length in Litigation v. Jail Time; however this article caught my eye. At the very bottom it

English: Jet skis at Downhill. A bit of action...

Image via Wikipedia

mentions another boating accident. The owner of the jet skis who rented the jet skis was fined £450 for renting the jet skis.

Again another example of how in the US we sue, in Europe they charge criminally. Although in this case a £450 fine is probably much easier to deal with than protracted litigation, it still is a criminal charge that will be on someone’s record for life.

However the basic issue is who is going to take responsibility for dealing with problems. In Europe the government deals with the liability between two people. In the US, most of the time the victim is in charge of his life and any money someone may owe him.

See: Brit held after death of Cypriot diver

Enhanced by Zemanta

Moab Confluence: Edward Abbey Writing Contest

Announcing the 2008 Confluence Writing Contest

Confluence: A Celebration of Reading and Writing in Moab, UT is hosting its first online writing contest. Submit your work through our website, http://www.moabconfluence.org, and compete for a $250 cash prize and the opportunity to be published in the Mountain Gazette.

The 2008 theme for Confluence is the writing of Edward Abbey. In honor of this theme, Confluence hopes to encourage and promote writing in a style that evokes the spirit and emotion that Edward Abbey was famous for – a story, fiction or non-fiction, that creates a desire to get off the couch and get outside – an article that brings the author’s place, its smells and the feeling of being there, right to the reader and motivates him or her to do something, to get going.

Submissions must be original work of less than 5,000 words. All work must be submitted by September 15th, 2008, and the winner will be announced on October 19th, 2008.

Please see our website for more detailed information about submission, judges, and how to enter.
http://www.moabconfluence.org/writingcontest.cfm

Please contact me if you have any questions about this contest, our literary festival scheduled for October 14 – 19, writing workshops, or how hot it is in Moab right now!

Laurie Collins
Confluence Director
435-220-0068


Colorado River Basin Science and Resource Management Symposium

Colorado River Basin Science and Resource Management Symposium
November 18-20, 2008
Doubletree Resort Hotel
5401 N. Scottsdale Road
Scottsdale, AZ

This symposium will promote the exchange of information on research and management activities related to the restoration/conservation of the Colorado River and its major tributaries from the headwaters to the U.S./Mexico border. This 2-1/2 day symposium will feature plenary sessions as well as concurrent technical sessions, vendors and poster sessions.

Program Highlights

English: Glen Canyon Dam and Bridge from the O...

Image via Wikipedia



Multiple programs to restore and conserve the Colorado River’s native species and habitat have evolved independently since 1980 – programs that have had a major impact on water management and conservation efforts. These programs have many common goals and objectives, but there has been no formal opportunity for the exchange of information among these programs. This basin-wide symposium will provide scientists, stakeholders, land and resource managers, and decision-makers the opportunity to learn about these various programs and exchange ideas and data enhancing the effectiveness of these programs – and their success in restoring and conserving the river’s ecosystem.

Plenary and Technical Session Topics Include:

Status and trends of aquatic resources, including native and nonnative fishes

Climate change and long term drought: how will it affect restoration efforts?

Adaptive management and collaborative management decision making

Instream flow management and protection (including dam operations and reservoirs)

Nonnative fish management and restoration

Integrating recreational fisheries with native fish conservation

Monitoring program design and effectiveness

Native fish propagation, stocking genetic management

Sediment conservation and management

Societal values and Native American perspectives

Riparian habitat monitoring and restoration

More information on this symposium –

including a secure, on-line registration form –

is available at http://www.watereducation.org

U.S. Geological Survey – Southwest Biological Science Center

Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program

Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program

Bureau of Reclamation

National Park Service

Colorado River Fish and Wildlife Council

Water Education Foundation

San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program

Conference Sponsors:

Time and Place: All day Tuesday, November 18, all day Wednesday, November 19, and the morning of Thursday, November 20 at the Doubletree Resort Hotel, 5401 N. Scottsdale Road in Scottsdale.

Registration: $250; fee includes lunches and receptions on November 18 and 19.

Hotel Reservations: We have secured a limited number of rooms at the special rate of $102, plus tax, per night. You can call to reserve a room, 480-947-5400, or access the room block at http://doubletree.hilton.com/en/dt/groups/ personalized/PHXSJDT-WEF-20081114/ index.jhtml Be sure to mention the Water Education Foundation.

Vendors and Sponsors: Booth spaces are available for $1,000; sponsoring opportunities are available. Contact Jean Nordmann at Water Education Foundation for information, 916-444-6240 or jnordmann@watereducation.org

Abstracts: For information on abstract format, including a sample, and contact information for abstract submittal, visit the Water Education Foundation’s web site, www.watereducation.org

Conference Sponsors:

For more information, contact Water Education Foundation

717 K Street, Suite 317
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: 916-444-6240
Fax: 916-448-7699
www.watereducation.org
Enhanced by Zemanta

GCRGA and the BQR

I get a ton of magazines, online and in print. The one that is always scanned before I leave the post office and read as soon as I get back is the Boatman’s

Grand Canyon 1

Grand Canyon 1 (Photo credit: krandolph)

Quarterly Review. The BQR is the quarterly publication of the Grand Canyon River Guides Association. I work in the Grand Canyon as a boatman every once in a while and it’s never enough time in the canyon. However my reasons for loving the BQR are the publication itself. It is filled with articles about the history, flora, fauna, geology and people of the Grand Canyon. Most importantly each article is filled with passion for the Grand Canyon. It is extremely well written and brings to life that beautiful part of the world in my home in Colorado that is a thousand miles away.

If you are a lover of the Grand Canyon, have hiked it or rowed it I strongly urge you to join the Grand Canyon River Guides Association. The GCRGA is working hard to preserve the canyon. The association will, if you want, keep you up to date on what is going on both at the bottom of the canyon and the top of the bureaucracy. The GCRGA is a great organization that is full of passionate, hard working people that I am proud to be allowed to associate with.

If you don’t know anything about the Grand Canyon but each quarter want a publication that will leave you breathless and wondering why you have not gotten there or back there, become a member of the GCRGA. You don’t have to be a river guide, only a lover of great writing and/or the Grand Canyon.

Membership is $30 a year or you can get a lifetime membership for $277. (As they say, one dollar for every mile the river flows.)

You should also go, see, and experience the Grand Canyon.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Everyman lives for the time and the place to prove he is more than everyone else believes he is.

Everyman lives for the time and the place to prove he is more than everyone else believes he is.


Lawsuit against university outdoor program

The Columbus Dispatch is reporting that Christopher Mance has filed a lawsuit against Ohio Universityfor injuries he suffered when he fell into a fire on a

Ohio University

Image via Wikipedia

University outdoor trip. The story is titled Disfiguring fall into campfire spurs lawsuit against OU. Mance, the plaintiff was a few credits from completing his bachelor’s degree to become a wilderness educator. During a wilderness survival trip in 2006 he suffered an epileptic seizure and fell face first into a fire suffering burns to his face, arms and hands.

The plaintiff and his family are suing the university for $300,000 because they claim the university was responsible for the accident. They claim the plaintiff is unable to secure work in the outdoor field after receiving his injuries.

The university knew of the plaintiff’s medical condition which he noted on a medical form he completed before going on the trip. (For more information on why pre-trip medical forms create liability see: Legal Issues in Wilderness First Aid.) The plaintiff was taking medication to control the seizures but the drug is allegedly less effective when sleep and eating habits are disruptive which they were on the trip.

The incident occurred during a solo part of the trip when the students were left alone to feed and take care of themselves. The suit claims that an instructor should have been assigned to watch the plaintiff to make sure he was safe. (Doesn’t that sort of eliminate the idea behind the solo?)

The attorney for the plaintiffs’ also stated “the university did not appoint an instructor to supervise Mance or send him for a medical check to determine whether he could handle the trip. He said Mance and his parents were unaware of the risks involved in the trip.”

This is a very sad case. A senior with only a few credits left to graduate in the field of outdoor recreation and education that falls victim to an accident in the field. On top of that the accident is disfiguring which is a double edged sword.

However a read of the article and possibly the complaint raises a lot of disturbing statements. You can reasonably assume that the plaintiff is over the age of 18, an adult able to make decisions about his own health and welfare. The complaint places all of the responsibility on the university. It was the universities responsibility to make sure he was safe, able to undertake the trip and able to physically handle the trip. Worse, it was the university’s responsibility to have the plaintiff determine if he was medically able to undertake the trip.

At what point do you take personal responsibility for your actions? We might have created some of these problems ourselves. We rely on outdoor programs to determine whether or not we can physically and medically undertake a trip. When in reality those people know nothing about us and are not physicians. The attempt to solve a problem as in this case, probably has created litigation. You and your doctor are the only ones who can make a decision as to whether you should undertake a trip. Your physician is the only person legally allowed and medically able to make that decision. For more information on this subject see: Legal Watch: Prescriptions and the Law, Legal Issues in First Aid #3: The prescription drug conundrum, Legal Issues in Wilderness First Aid: Value of various first aid certificates and training, Legal Issues in Wilderness First Aid.

For more articles on lawsuits against colleges for injuries in outdoor programs see: Case Brief: Release Protects Gonzaga University from Lawsuit Following Student Death, College successfully defends student high altitude fatality, Assumption of Risk and Inherent Risk in Higher Outdoor Education, and College loses suit by parents of deceased student from snow skiing class.

This is a sad case were the basis of the lawsuit seems to ride on the idea that someone else should have been responsible for me and my problems.

Enhanced by Zemanta