Backcountry skier sues in Small Claims Court in San Miguel County Colorado for injuries she received when a backcountry snowboarder triggered an Avalanche that injured her.

The defendant snowboarder had agreed not to descend the slope until the lower parties had called and told them they had cleared the area. The defendant failed to wait and admitted he had triggered the Avalanche.

BEFORE COMMENTING READ EVERYTHING. I WAS NOT THE ATTORNEY FOR EITHER PARTY IN THIS CASE. The defendant in his comments about this article made that statement that I was the plaintiff’s attorney. He was the one in court, not me. How he made that mistake I don’t know. But Sober Up!

State: Colorado, San Miguel Small Claims Court

Plaintiff: Jayleen Troutwin

Defendant: Christopher Parke

Plaintiff Claims: Negligence

Defendant Defenses:

Holding: for the plaintiff

Year: 2017


Under Colorado law, you can create a duty when you agree to act or not act. Here the defendant created a duty when he agreed not to descend the slope until he had received a phone call from the first party that they had cleared the danger area.

This is a first of its kind suit that I have found, and the judge’s decision in this case is striking in its clarity and reasoning. At the same time, it might open up backcountry injuries to more litigation. The facts that created this lawsuit are specific in how the duty was created, and that will be rare in 90% of the backcountry accidents.

I have attached the written decision of the court to this analysis, and I encourage you to read it.

Facts: taken from the complaint, the CAIC Report and The Order of Judgment

The plaintiff was skiing out of bounds in Bear Creek outside of the Telluride Ski Area. While skiing they ran into the defendant and his friend. The defendant and friend were not ready to go, so the plaintiff and friend took off. The plaintiff and friend stated they would call the defendant when they were out of the danger zone at the bottom of the chute they both intended to ski.

The defendant and his friend did not wait, and triggered an avalanche. Plaintiff was still repelling when the avalanche hit her sweeping her off the rappel, and she fell 1200 feet down the slope riding the avalanche. She survived on top of the snow with several injuries.

The defendant admitted that it was his fault, and he would pay for the plaintiff’s medical bills. He made one payment and no others. The Plaintiff’s medical bills were in excess of $50,000. However, she still skied out after the incident.

The plaintiff sued the defendant in Small Claims Court. Small Claims court is for parties without attorneys, and the judge can grant a maximum of $7500.00 in damages.

Analysis: making sense of the law based on these facts.

Normally, participants in sporting or outdoor recreation events assume the risks inherent in the sport. Avalanches are an inherent risk of skiing. The Colorado Supreme Court has stated that in Colorado Supreme Court rules that an inbounds Avalanche is an inherent risk assumed by skiers based upon the Colorado Skier Safety Act.

Under most circumstances, the plaintiff in this situation would have assumed the risk of her injuries. What sets this decision apart was the agreement at the top of the mountain between the two groups of people. One group agreed not to descend into the chute until the other group had cleared the chute.

This creates an assumed duty on the part of the defendant. By agreeing to the acts, the plaintiff assumed a duty to the defendant.

The assumed duty doctrine “must be predicated on two factual findings.” “A plaintiff must first show that the defendant, either through its affirmative acts or through a promise to act, undertook to render a service that was reasonably calculated to prevent the type of harm that befell the plaintiff.” “Second, a plaintiff must also show either that he relied on the defendant to perform the service or that defendant’s undertaking increased plaintiff’s risk.”

This assumed duty was done specifically to prevent injuries to the other skiers. The skiers also relied on this agreement when they skied down the slope.

This Court, therefore, finds that the Defendant assumed a duty of care in agreeing not to ski his chosen route while Troutwin and Hope were still skiing theirs in an effort to avoid a skier-triggered avalanche.

Thus, when the defendant started down the chute, he violated the agreed to duty of care to the skiers below them.

The next issue to prove negligence in this case is causation or proximate causation. The breach of the duty by the defendant must be related to the injury the plaintiff received. The court simply found but for the actions of the defendant, the injuries of the plaintiff would not have occurred.

The defendant admitted triggering the avalanche, and the avalanche is what swept the plaintiff off the rappel.

The defendant raised two defenses at trial. Comparative Negligence and Assumption of Risk.

Comparative negligence asks, “did the actions of the plaintiff create or expose the plaintiff to an unreasonable risk of harm?” Comparative negligence is applied to reduce the damages the plaintiff might receive if both parties are at fault in causing the injuries to the plaintiff.

The defendant argued the plaintiff assumed the risk of her injuries and was a partial cause of her injuries when she did not use a backup device on her rappel.

The court looked at the failure to use a backup system on rappel as the same as failing to wear a seatbelt in a car or failing to wear a helmet while riding a motorcycle. Both have been determined by the Colorado Supreme Court to not be a component contributing to comparative negligence.

The reasoning behind this is simple. The plaintiff should not be required to determine in advance the negligence of any third party. Meaning it is not the injured parties’ duty, in advance to determine and then deal with any possible negligence of any other person. If that was the case, you could never leave the house because you never guessed what injury you might have received.

…[f]irst, a defendant should not diminish the consequences of his negligence by the failure of the injured party to anticipate defendant’s negligence in causing the accident itself. Second, a defense premised on an injured party’s failure to wear a protective helmet would result in a windfall to tortfeasors who pay only partially for the harm their negligence caused. Third, allowing the defense would lead to a veritable battle of experts as to what injuries would have or have not been avoided had the plaintiff been wearing a helmet.

The court found that neither comparative negligence, nor assumption of the risk applied to these facts and were not a defense to the plaintiff’s claims.

The court also added a section to its opinion about the future of backcountry skiing and the Policy issues this decision might create. It is well-written and worth quoting here.

51. This Court has determined that Parke’s duty of care is a result of his express assumption of that duty, rather than broader policy concerns that are typically addressed in protracted discussions of legal duty. It is nevertheless, worth noting that given the increasing popularity of backcountry skiing and skiing into Bear Creek, in particular, the risk of skiers triggering avalanches above one-another is likely increasing. In situations where skiers have no knowledge of whether a group is below, the legal outcome of an accident may be different than the result reached here. A liability rule that thus encourages skiers to avoid investigating whether their descent might pose a risk to those below feels averse to sound public policy. Communication and coordination between groups of backcountry skiers is surely good practice.

52. But meaningful communication is not necessarily impossible in these circumstances. This Court is swayed by the availability of radios like that which Troutwin and Hope carried. These radios are a communication option that appears more reliable than cellular telephones. Perhaps if they become more prevalent, more communication between parties will take place. And it follows and is foreseeable that other communications platforms or safety standards will develop to address this specific risk. The liability rule discussed here does not necessarily foreclose those developments.

53. The ethics and liability rules associated with backcountry skiing are likely to continue to evolve as its popularity increases and safety standards emerge. The law is likely to continue to evolve in kind.

It is refreshing to see a judge look at the broader aspect of his or her decision as it applies to an evolving sport.

The court found that the plaintiff suffered $9,660.00 in damages. The jurisdictional limit a Colorado Small Claims court can issue is a maximum of $7,500.00, which is the amount the plaintiff was awarded.

So Now What?

If you say you are going to do something, do it. If you say you are going to wait, wait. It is that simple.

More importantly, litigation has now entered the realm of backcountry skiing. Will it create more litigation, probably? Backcountry skiers who have no health insurance or no income while they recover will be looking for a way to get hospital bill collectors off their phone and pizza coming to the front door. Worse, health insurance companies will look at a way through their subrogation clauses to try to recover the money they pay out on behalf of their insureds.

At the same time, based upon these facts, the defendant was the sole cause of the plaintiff’s injuries not because he triggered an avalanche, but because he agreed not to trigger an avalanche.

Documents Attached:

Notice, Claim and Summons to Appear for a Trial.   


Trial Exhibits 1 through 9

Exhibit 1

Exhibit 2

Exhibit 3

Exhibit 4

Exhibit 5

Exhibit 6

Exhibit 7

Exhibit 8

Exhibit 9

Order of Judgment

What do you think? Leave a comment.

Copyright 2017 Recreation Law (720) 334 8529

If you like this let your friends know or post it on FB, Twitter or LinkedIn

If you are interested in having me write your release, fill out this Information Form and Contract and send it to me.

Author: Outdoor Recreation Insurance, Risk Management and Law

To Purchase Go Here:

Facebook Page: Outdoor Recreation & Adventure Travel Law


By Recreation Law    James H. Moss

#AdventureTourism, #AdventureTravelLaw, #AdventureTravelLawyer, #AttorneyatLaw, #Backpacking, #BicyclingLaw, #Camps, #ChallengeCourse, #ChallengeCourseLaw, #ChallengeCourseLawyer, #CyclingLaw, #FitnessLaw, #FitnessLawyer, #Hiking, #HumanPowered, #HumanPoweredRecreation, #IceClimbing, #JamesHMoss, #JimMoss, #Law, #Mountaineering, #Negligence, #OutdoorLaw, #OutdoorRecreationLaw, #OutsideLaw, #OutsideLawyer, #RecLaw, #Rec-Law, #RecLawBlog, #Rec-LawBlog, #RecLawyer, #RecreationalLawyer, #RecreationLaw, #RecreationLawBlog, #RecreationLawcom, #Recreation-Lawcom,, #RiskManagement, #RockClimbing, #RockClimbingLawyer, #RopesCourse, #RopesCourseLawyer, #SkiAreas, #Skiing, #SkiLaw, #Snowboarding, #SummerCamp, #Tourism, #TravelLaw, #YouthCamps, #ZipLineLawyer, #RecreationLaw, #OutdoorLaw, #OutdoorRecreationLaw, #SkiLaw,

Backcountry Magazine and G3 are giving away G3 gear, ‘Tis The Season For Backcountry Goodness


G3 - Genuine Guide Gear

‘Tis The season for backcountry Goodness

December 2015
Genuine Guide Gear

FREEskier contest

Freeskier Ultimate BACKCOUNTRY giveaway

Freeskier Magazine and G3 are hooking one lucky skier up with their dream backcountry gear set-up. Head to the contest page, pick out your dream set-up, enter the contest, and cross your fingers.

Enter To Win

Genuine Guide Gear

G3 Gift Cards

give THE gift of gear. new G3 gift cards.

Not sure what backcountry gear to get your favourite skier or rider this holiday season? New G3 Gift Cards* have you covered. Choose the amount you want to give, and let the lucky skier or rider choose their own G3 gear.

*Currently only available in Canada and the United States.

Give G3 Gift Cards Find Out More

Genuine Guide Gear


“the line looked all good until the pow stopped…”

G3’s most popular video series is back. In #G3POV Episode 3, get James McSkimming’s skier’s eye view of a steep, exposed and ‘not-so-deep’ descent in the Tantalus Range, Squamish, BC, Canada.

What goes up must come down, right?


article image

purchase-arrowCLimbing skins

article image


G3 - Genuine Guide Gear

Expect More.

© G3 Genuine Guide Gear Inc. 2015.
All Rights Reserved.



Some People can Never wait for Winter and G3 Knows Them

G3 - Genuine Guide Gear

For Some, Winter Is Already Here.

November 2014


get some turns. share. tag. win.

#FirstTurnsFetish Final Week

Is your local mountain getting snow? Twitching for those first turns yet? Take matters into your own hands. Get hiking, show us your season opening turns, get creative, and enter to WIN $1000+ of backcountry skiing or splitboarding gear.

#FirstTurnsFetish G3 on Instagram

Sawtooth Couloirs

“156 Kick Steps Later…”

“May 1st, wearing shorts, we sat at the Kelowna airport armed with our large ski bags and even larger 80 liters bags – we were ready for the adventure.” That was Mel’s season ender. Just wait until you see how she’s starting her season this month. 40,000 m (131,000 ft) of vert so far. Go Mel!

Mel’s Story & Video Mel’s Skins

R&D in Chile

Always winter somewhere

On the eve of the Northern Hemisphere’s winter season, we’re throwing it back to the Southern Hemi’s winter. New G3 ski designer Sigi Rumpfhuber was jonesing for some turns, and had the perfect skis to test.

R&D in Chile Sigi Joins G3

G3 ION Bindingspurchase-arrowMore IONs ready Climbing Skinspurchase-arrowGet G3 Skins


Theo Meiners Avalanche Research Grants


In honor of Theo Meiners’ tireless efforts to support avalanche research prior to his passing in the fall of 2012, new funding is available to support avalanche research projects. The International Snow Science Workshop 2012 has teamed with John Byrne III, the owner of Alyeska Resort, to offer two separate grants of $2,500 each during the fall of 2013, and two additional grants of $2,500 during the fall of 2014. These funds will be administered by the American Avalanche Association grants process.

Applications for the research grants must be submitted by November 30, 2013 with the awards being disseminated by December 31, 2013. The same dates will apply for the 2014 grants.

One of the two grants, the “research” grant, can be applied to basic research projects in avalanche behavior or modeling. The other “practical” grant will be awarded to a practitioner project with an emphasis on a subject that would be relevant to helicopter skiing.

Applicants should describe their proposed project, identify the need for grant funding as well as where the funding would be applied, and present a proposed timeline. All grant recipients will be required to submit a paper for presentation at the International Snow Science Workshop. For 2013 recipients they will be required to submit for Banff in 2014. Grant recipients in 2014 will be required to submit for Breckenridge in 2016.

Inquiries about the grants and appropriate projects can be directed to David Hamre at hamred or 907-223-9590

Applications can be submitted by downloading the form and emailing your application to the Chair of the AAA Research Committee (Jordy Hendrikx: jordy.hendrikx).

For more information refer to:

Updates from the Mammut Barryvox Avalanche Beacon

Mammut presents
spacer.gif Mammut

Mammut Barryvox News

photo: jeremy bernard

PULSE Barryvox update: Mammut presents “the intelligent search”

After an avalanche, every second counts, as after just 15 minutes the chances of survival for anyone buried under the snow drop dramatically.

Our developers have been working intensively to optimize our Barryvox. The result is a simplified and even more effective search for buried subjects following an avalanche. The improved graphics-guided and audio-supported fine search revolutionizes fine searching in a cross (bracketing) in the last few meters.

From the middle of October 2013, the update to firmware 4.0 will be available from your authorized Mammut Barryvox Service Center!

Photo: Jeremy Bernard


Details of the PULSE Barryvox update

PULSE Barryvox

PULSE Barryvox: Digital/analog combo device with three antennas

Overview of key features:1. Easy to use thanks to a clear operating concept

2. Precise location thanks to a 360° display and 3 antennas

3. Time saving thanks to an overview in the event of several buried subjects

button_cta_left.gif PULSE Barryvox button_cta_right.gif
button_facebook_left.gif Share button_facebook_right.gif
PULSE Barryvox

Don’t forget the Barryvox winter check!

Switch the device on and note the display for the self-test and battery test. We also recommend inspecting the device for any signs of mechanical damage to the housing, contamination or damage to the battery contacts, as well as making sure that the main switch is working correctly. If any inconsistencies are identified during these checks, you must send the device to a Mammut Barryvox Service Center.

button_cta_left.gif Barryvox Service Center button_cta_right.gif
button_facebook_left.gif Share button_facebook_right.gif
bottom_rounded_left.gif bottom_rounded_right.gif

G3 Contest for Backcountry Touring Gear

G3 Logo

Gear Up For Touring Season

March 2013 e-newsletter

header image

Story Image Enter to Win

Touring Season Giveaway

Ski season ain’t over yet. Make the most of the long days and spring weather… touring season is here.

Win a $500 touring gear package! We’re giving it away to one lucky e-newsletter subscriber. Gotta be in it to win it!

Enter to Win


Story Image Gear Up with G3

Subscriber Specials

From Climbing Skins to Utility Straps, Probes to Rutschblock Cords, we’ve got your back in the backcountry this spring.

For our e-newsletter subscribers only, we’ve bundled up some of our favourite gear and thrown in some FREE G3 swag to say thanks.

We’ve also extended the FREE Shipping on orders over $50 (terms and conditions apply).

Shop Specials


Product Placeholder
Show Us Some Skin
See Winners
Product Placeholder
The Lone Canadian Telemarker
Grand Targhee
Product Placeholder
Bronchitis & World Champs
Full Story


Winter Ain’t Over Yet. Long Live Touring Season!
G3 Logo Expect more.
Copyright © G3 Genuine Guide Gear 2012.
All Rights Reserved.
Browse Gear
Find a dealer
Terms & Privacy
Contact Us
twitter_icon.gif Twitter
facebook_icon.gif Facebook
youtube.gif Youtube
vimeo.gif Vimeo


By Recreation Law   James H. Moss                  Jim Moss